Purchase
POA
Transformatör TCO (Toplam Sahip Olma Maliyeti) Hesaplayıcısı
Transformatör verimlilik seviyelerinin tam yaşam döngüsü maliyetini karşılaştırın — satın alma fiyatı artı indirimli yüksüz ve yüklü kayıplar, O&M ve hurda değeri — hizmet ömrü boyunca.
Sonuç
Yükünüzü girin → saniyeler içinde tam bir tasarım ve BOM alın
Örnek çıktıTotal cost of ownership (present value)
$61k
1000 kVA · S13 — oil-immersed (grade 3) · 50% load · 20 yr · 6% discount
Annual loss
29,828 kWh
PV of losses
$48k
Loss factor
13.4×
Full-cost breakdown (20 years, discounted)
| Component | Value |
|---|---|
| Initial purchase | POA |
| No-load loss 830 W | $12k |
| Load loss 10300 W | $36k |
| O&M (1%/yr, discounted) | $2k |
| Salvage (10% residual, discounted) | −$371 |
| Total cost of ownership | $61k |
Efficiency-level comparison (lowest TCO first)
| Efficiency level | Price | Po | Pk | Loss/yr | TCO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amorphous alloy — oil-immersed | POA | 270 W | 10300 W | 24,922 | $56k |
| S20 — oil-immersed (NX1) | POA | 450 W | 9600 W | 24,966 | $56k |
| S13 — oil-immersed (grade 3) ◂ selected | POA | 830 W | 10300 W | 29,828 | $61k |
| S11 — oil-immersed (grade 3) | POA | 1150 W | 10300 W | 32,631 | $65k |
| SCB13 — dry-type | POA | 1200 W | 9600 W | 31,536 | $67k |
Payback insight
Paying $636 extra for "S13 — oil-immersed (grade 3)" over the lowest-cost "S11 — oil-immersed (grade 3)" saves 2,803 kWh/yr — simple payback ≈ 1.9 years.
Transformatör verimlilik seviyelerini (S11, S13, S20, amorf, SCB13) toplam sahip olma maliyeti üzerinden karşılaştıran mühendisler ve satın almacılar için.
Hesaplayıcıyı kullanın
Çözümlü örnek
Önceden hesaplanmış bir referans örneği (taranabilir — JavaScript gerekmez). Canlı sonuç için yukarıya kendi parametrelerinizi girin.
Çözümlü örnek — 1000 kVA, %50 yük, 0,12 $/kWh, 20 yıl
Total cost of ownership (present value)
$61k
1000 kVA · S13 — oil-immersed (grade 3) · 50% load · 20 yr · 6% discount
Purchase
POA
Annual loss
29,828 kWh
PV of losses
$48k
Loss factor
13.4×
Full-cost breakdown (20 years, discounted)
| Component | Value |
|---|---|
| Initial purchase | POA |
| No-load loss 830 W | $12k |
| Load loss 10300 W | $36k |
| O&M (1%/yr, discounted) | $2k |
| Salvage (10% residual, discounted) | −$371 |
| Total cost of ownership | $61k |
Efficiency-level comparison (lowest TCO first)
| Efficiency level | Price | Po | Pk | Loss/yr | TCO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amorphous alloy — oil-immersed | POA | 270 W | 10300 W | 24,922 | $56k |
| S20 — oil-immersed (NX1) | POA | 450 W | 9600 W | 24,966 | $56k |
| S13 — oil-immersed (grade 3) ◂ selected | POA | 830 W | 10300 W | 29,828 | $61k |
| S11 — oil-immersed (grade 3) | POA | 1150 W | 10300 W | 32,631 | $65k |
| SCB13 — dry-type | POA | 1200 W | 9600 W | 31,536 | $67k |
Payback insight
Paying $636 extra for "S13 — oil-immersed (grade 3)" over the lowest-cost "S11 — oil-immersed (grade 3)" saves 2,803 kWh/yr — simple payback ≈ 1.9 years.
Çözümlü örnek — 630 kVA S20, %60 yük, 0,15 $/kWh, 25 yıl
Total cost of ownership (present value)
$63k
630 kVA · S20 — oil-immersed (NX1) · 60% load · 25 yr · 6% discount
Purchase
POA
Annual loss
21,861 kWh
PV of losses
$51k
Loss factor
15.4×
Full-cost breakdown (25 years, discounted)
| Component | Value |
|---|---|
| Initial purchase | POA |
| No-load loss 318 W | $6k |
| Load loss 6048 W | $44k |
| O&M (1%/yr, discounted) | $2k |
| Salvage (10% residual, discounted) | −$261 |
| Total cost of ownership | $63k |
Efficiency-level comparison (lowest TCO first)
| Efficiency level | Price | Po | Pk | Loss/yr | TCO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amorphous alloy — oil-immersed | POA | 191 W | 6489 W | 22,136 | $63k |
| S20 — oil-immersed (NX1) ◂ selected | POA | 318 W | 6048 W | 21,861 | $63k |
| S13 — oil-immersed (grade 3) | POA | 587 W | 6736 W | 26,383 | $72k |
| SCB13 — dry-type | POA | 849 W | 6048 W | 26,506 | $74k |
| S11 — oil-immersed (grade 3) | POA | 813 W | 6489 W | 27,587 | $74k |
Payback insight
Paying $2,409 extra for "S20 — oil-immersed (NX1)" over the lowest-cost "S11 — oil-immersed (grade 3)" saves 5,727 kWh/yr — simple payback ≈ 2.8 years.
Nasıl hesaplandı
- · Yıllık enerji kaybı: W = (Po + Pk × LF²) × saat, burada Po = yüksüz kayıp, Pk = yüklü kayıp, LF = ortalama yük faktörü.
- · Yıllık kayıp maliyeti: Closs = W × tarife.
- · Kayıp kapitalizasyon faktörü: A = [1 − ((1+g)/(1+r))ᴺ] ÷ (r − g) — 1 $ yıllık kayıp maliyetinin bugünkü değeri.
- · TCO = Satın alma + PV(kayıplar) + PV(O&M) − PV(hurda), tümü r oranında indirgenir.
Referans alınan standartlar
| Standard | Scope |
|---|---|
| IEC 60076 | Güç transformatörleri — anma değerleri, kayıplar ve verimlilik |
| IEC 60364-8-1 | Alçak gerilim elektrik tesisatlarında enerji verimliliği |
| IEEE C57.120 | Güç ve dağıtım transformatörleri için kayıp değerlendirme kılavuzu |
| GB 20052-2020 | Güç transformatörleri için enerji verimliliği dereceleri |
Sıkça sorulan sorular
What is transformer total cost of ownership (TCO)?
TCO = purchase price plus the present value of lifetime no-load and load losses, O&M and replacement. Losses dominate: over 20-30 years, the capitalized cost of losses often equals 1-2x the purchase price. The calculator discounts losses per IEC 60076 and IEEE C57.120 and compares S11/S13/S20/amorphous/SCB13.
How much more does a low-loss transformer cost and how fast does it pay back?
S13 costs 10-20% more than S11 and cuts No-Load Loss ~25%, typically paying back in 2-4 years where tariffs exceed $0.08/kWh. Amorphous-core transformers cost 20-40% more but cut no-load loss 60-70%, ideal for lightly loaded units. The calculator computes the payback and net present value of the premium.
What is the difference between no-load and load losses?
No-load (iron) loss is constant whenever the Transformer is energized, independent of load — the dominant cost for lightly loaded units. Load (copper) loss varies with the square of load current and dominates at high loading. A transformer loaded at 30% is loss-dominated by no-load loss; the calculator weights both by load profile.
What efficiency grades do transformer standards define?
IEC 60076-20 and GB 20052 define efficiency classes (e.g. Tier 1/Tier 2 in EU, and China's grade 1/2/3). Higher grades mean lower no-load and load losses. China's GB 20052-2020 grades transformers 1-3, with grade 1 being the most efficient. The calculator aligns models to these grades.
When does an amorphous-core transformer make economic sense?
Amorphous-core units cut no-load loss 60-70% but cost 20-40% more, so they win for transformers that run lightly loaded or energised 24/7 with low utilization (e.g. 20-30% loading). At high loading the load loss dominates and the premium pays back slower. The calculator evaluates payback against your load profile.
Bu hesaplayıcıyı yerleştirin
Bu hesaplayıcıyı kendi web sitenize ücretsiz ekleyin. iframe her genişliğe uyum sağlar ve tamamen ziyaretçinizin tarayıcısında çalışır.
İlgili araçlar
SelectionTransformatör Seçim HesaplayıcısıEconomicsTransformatör Verimliliği ve CO₂ HesaplayıcıEconomicsElektrik Maliyeti Hesaplayıcı
Yalnızca ön tasarım için referans tahminler (FOB Qingdao, EXW) — nihai teklif değildir. Boyutlandırmayı projenize ve yerel standartlarınıza göre doğrulayın.
Send my complete design report
Get the full bill of materials, single-line diagram, calculation steps and FOB pricing as a PDF — free, no sign-up.
Your data stays private. No spam — only a reply to your enquiry.