QDTB®变压器官网

变压器效率与 CO₂ 计算器

根据能效等级、负载率和运行小时数,估算变压器年损耗与 CO₂ 排放,并比较不同能效等级以了解碳影响。

开始计算

结果

输入您的负载 → 数秒内获得完整设计及 BOM

示例输出
Annual losses & CO₂ emissions
17.90 tCO₂/yr
1000 kVA · S13 — oil-immersed (grade 3) · 50% load · 8760 h · 0.6 tCO₂/MWh
No-load loss
830 W
Load loss
10300 W
Annual losses
29,828 kWh
Efficiency
99.32%
Loss & efficiency calculation
No-load loss830 W × 8760 h = 7,271 kWh/yr
Load loss10300 W × (50%)² × 8760 h = 22,557 kWh/yr
Annual losses= 29,828 kWh/yr
Efficiency4,380,000 ÷ (4,380,000 + 29,828) = 99.32%
CO₂ emissions29,828 kWh × 0.6 tCO₂/MWh ÷ 1000 = 17.90 tCO₂/yr
Efficiency-level comparison (lowest CO₂ first)
Efficiency levelPoPkLoss/yrCO₂/yr
Amorphous alloy — oil-immersed270 W10300 W24,92214.95
S20 — oil-immersed (NX1)450 W9600 W24,96614.98
S13 — oil-immersed (grade 3) ◂ selected830 W10300 W29,82817.90
SCB13 — dry-type1200 W9600 W31,53618.92
S11 — oil-immersed (grade 3)1150 W10300 W32,63119.58
Carbon insight
Upgrading from "S13 — oil-immersed (grade 3)" to the lowest-carbon "Amorphous alloy — oil-immersed" would avoid ≈ 4,906 kWh and ≈ 2.94 tCO₂ per year at this load factor — subject to the actual nameplate losses and the local grid emission factor.
Note
Losses use typical values (GB 20052 / industry references) scaled from 1000 kVA — always verify against the nameplate. Output energy assumes PF = 1 (kVA × PF × load factor × hours). The grid emission factor varies by region (≈0.2–1.0 tCO₂/MWh); adjust it to your local grid for a meaningful result.

适用于 ESG、能源审计和工厂工程师,用于量化变压器损耗与碳足迹,并为选用更高能效变压器提供依据。

使用计算器

计算示例

预先计算的参考示例(可抓取——无需 JavaScript)。在上方输入您自己的参数以获取实时结果。

示例 1 — S13 1000 kVA,50% 负载

Annual losses & CO₂ emissions
17.90 tCO₂/yr
1000 kVA · S13 — oil-immersed (grade 3) · 50% load · 8760 h · 0.6 tCO₂/MWh
No-load loss
830 W
Load loss
10300 W
Annual losses
29,828 kWh
Efficiency
99.32%
Loss & efficiency calculation
No-load loss830 W × 8760 h = 7,271 kWh/yr
Load loss10300 W × (50%)² × 8760 h = 22,557 kWh/yr
Annual losses= 29,828 kWh/yr
Efficiency4,380,000 ÷ (4,380,000 + 29,828) = 99.32%
CO₂ emissions29,828 kWh × 0.6 tCO₂/MWh ÷ 1000 = 17.90 tCO₂/yr
Efficiency-level comparison (lowest CO₂ first)
Efficiency levelPoPkLoss/yrCO₂/yr
Amorphous alloy — oil-immersed270 W10300 W24,92214.95
S20 — oil-immersed (NX1)450 W9600 W24,96614.98
S13 — oil-immersed (grade 3) ◂ selected830 W10300 W29,82817.90
SCB13 — dry-type1200 W9600 W31,53618.92
S11 — oil-immersed (grade 3)1150 W10300 W32,63119.58
Carbon insight
Upgrading from "S13 — oil-immersed (grade 3)" to the lowest-carbon "Amorphous alloy — oil-immersed" would avoid ≈ 4,906 kWh and ≈ 2.94 tCO₂ per year at this load factor — subject to the actual nameplate losses and the local grid emission factor.
Note
Losses use typical values (GB 20052 / industry references) scaled from 1000 kVA — always verify against the nameplate. Output energy assumes PF = 1 (kVA × PF × load factor × hours). The grid emission factor varies by region (≈0.2–1.0 tCO₂/MWh); adjust it to your local grid for a meaningful result.

示例 2 — S20 630 kVA,60% 负载

Annual losses & CO₂ emissions
12.02 tCO₂/yr
630 kVA · S20 — oil-immersed (NX1) · 60% load · 8760 h · 0.55 tCO₂/MWh
No-load loss
318 W
Load loss
6048 W
Annual losses
21,861 kWh
Efficiency
99.34%
Loss & efficiency calculation
No-load loss318 W × 8760 h = 2,788 kWh/yr
Load loss6048 W × (60%)² × 8760 h = 19,073 kWh/yr
Annual losses= 21,861 kWh/yr
Efficiency3,311,280 ÷ (3,311,280 + 21,861) = 99.34%
CO₂ emissions21,861 kWh × 0.55 tCO₂/MWh ÷ 1000 = 12.02 tCO₂/yr
Efficiency-level comparison (lowest CO₂ first)
Efficiency levelPoPkLoss/yrCO₂/yr
S20 — oil-immersed (NX1) ◂ selected318 W6048 W21,86112.02
Amorphous alloy — oil-immersed191 W6489 W22,13612.17
S13 — oil-immersed (grade 3)587 W6736 W26,38314.51
SCB13 — dry-type849 W6048 W26,50614.58
S11 — oil-immersed (grade 3)813 W6489 W27,58715.17
Carbon insight
"S20 — oil-immersed (NX1)" is the lowest-carbon option in this comparison.
Note
Losses use typical values (GB 20052 / industry references) scaled from 1000 kVA — always verify against the nameplate. Output energy assumes PF = 1 (kVA × PF × load factor × hours). The grid emission factor varies by region (≈0.2–1.0 tCO₂/MWh); adjust it to your local grid for a meaningful result.

计算过程

  • · 空载损耗电量 = Po × 小时数;负载损耗电量 = Pk × LF² × 小时数。
  • · 年损耗 = Po × 小时数 + Pk × LF² × 小时数。
  • · 效率 = 输出 ÷(输出 + 损耗),输出 = kVA × LF × 小时数。
  • · CO₂ 排放 = 年损耗 × 电网排放因子。
  • · 损耗以 1000 kVA 为基准按 Po ∝ S^0.75、Pk ∝ S 缩放。

引用标准

StandardScope
IEC 60076电力变压器
GB 20052电力变压器能效限定值及能效等级
IEC 60364-8-1低压电气装置——能效
ISO 14064-1温室气体 — 排放的量化与报告

常见问题

如何计算变压器的 CO2 排放?

CO2 = 年损耗(kWh)× 电网排放因子。空载损耗全天运行:1000 kVA、空载 1.2 kW 的变压器仅带电即年耗 10512 kWh。0.5 kg/kWh 排放因子下约 5.3 吨 CO2/年。计算器加总空载与负载损耗并换算碳排。

变压器应达到什么效率水平?

配电变压器满载效率 98-99.5%。GB 20052 与 IEC 60076-20 规定最低效率/损耗等级;选更高等级(S13/S20、SCB13/SCB14)可降空载损耗 20-40%。计算器对比各效率等级及其损耗与碳排影响。

变压器一年浪费多少电?

1000 kVA 变压器 50% 负载、空载 1.2 kW、满载损耗 8 kW 时年损耗约 1.2×8760 + 8×0.25×8760 = 28032 kWh。更低损耗的 S13 可降 15-25%。计算器量化年损耗及其费用。

变压器效率的最佳负载率是多少?

当负载损耗等于空载损耗时效率最高,配电变压器常在 40-60% 负载率。远低于此浪费空载损耗,远高于此增大铜耗。计算器展示效率曲线与最佳负载点。

如何比较两台变压器的全生命周期碳排?

对比 年损耗 × 寿命 × 排放因子,再加材料(铜、钢、油)的隐含碳。20-30 年尺度上损耗驱动的运行碳通常占主导。计算器算各型号运行 CO2,便于对 S11/S13/非晶排序。

嵌入此计算器

将此计算器免费添加到您自己的网站。iframe 可自适应任何宽度,并完全在访问者的浏览器中运行。

相关工具

结果仅为初步设计的工程估算,仅供参考。在采购或安装前,请务必依据适用标准、设备铭牌并由持证工程师进行核实。

发送我的完整设计报告

免费获取完整设备清单(BOM)、单线图、计算步骤与 FOB 报价的 PDF 报告,无需注册。

💬 WhatsApp 咨询

您的信息仅用于回复询盘,不用于任何其他用途。