QDTB® Transformer
All figures are configurator-generated feasibility-level estimates; drawings are schematic deliverables pending refinement by a licensed design institute, not construction documents.
All Solutions

400 kW Commercial Complex: 380 V PFC + Fire/Emergency Load Grading

S13-M-400/10 · 100 kvar PFC · 200 kW diesel fire backup · 3-tier load grading

1 · TL;DR Conclusion

Conclusion: this 400 kW commercial complex uses a 10 kV feed + a single S13-M-400/10 transformer, with 100 kvar PFC on the 380 V side raising PF to 0.95. Loads are graded in three tiers, and fire/emergency (80 kW grade-1 + 80 kW fire) is 100% covered by a 200 kW standby diesel — configurator total ≈ $99,100 (feasibility-level).

  • •400 kVA single S13 transformer: 84% loading, economical across commercial load swings
  • •100 kvar PFC (4×25): PF 0.85→0.95, avoids power-factor penalties
  • •3-tier grading: grade-1 80 + grade-2 120 + grade-3 200 kW, fire/emergency on dedicated circuit
  • •200 kW diesel backs 100% of fire/emergency (160 kW) with end-transfer ATS
  • •SH15 amorphous upgrade saves 2,015 kWh/yr (≈$241), 8.7 yr payback

2 · Solution Overview

A commercial complex is a mixed LV lighting + power load: lighting 150 kW, power 180 kW, sensitive 40 kW, fire 80 kW, with large diurnal/seasonal swings. The scheme uses a 10 kV feed, a single oil transformer, 380 V GGD distribution, 100 kvar PFC and three-tier load grading, with fire/emergency backed by a diesel.

400 kVA (single)
Transformer capacity
S13-M-400/10
Transformer model
10 kV / 0.4 kV
Voltage
400 kW
Installed load
320 kW (kd 0.8)
Demand
100 kvar (4×25)
PFC
200 kW diesel
Fire backup
80/120/200 kW
Load grading
SourceRoleShare kWShare
Grid 10 kVbase320 kW100%
Diesel 200 kWbackup0 kW0%

3 · Design Process & Rationale

1. Requirement identification

A commercial complex has volatile load dominated by lighting/HVAC/retail equipment, plus fire pumps and emergency lighting. We set: fire load on a dedicated circuit with end-transfer, normal retail loads graded tier-3.

2. Load grading

Three tiers: grade-1 80 kW (fire/emergency/critical), grade-2 120 kW (lifts/key retail), grade-3 200 kW (general lighting/shops). Grading drives the source mix and backup scope.

3. Source & mix

Grid 10 kV is the only base supply; fire/emergency (grade-1 80 + fire 80 = 160 kW) is backed by a 200 kW diesel, V9 reports 100% coverage, with end-transfer ATS on fire circuits.

4. Transformer sizing

Sd=320/0.95≈337 kVA → 400 kVA tier, single S13-M-400/10 oil unit (commercial norm, cost-first), 84% loading.

5. Reactive compensation

Central 100 kvar (4×25 kvar) on the 380 V side raises PF 0.85→0.95, cutting transformer loading and PF penalties — the key cost saver in commercial distribution.

6. Distribution & protection

MV KYN28A-12 incomer → single transformer → 380 V GGD bus. 50/51 overcurrent with 0.3/0.2 s grading; all 5 coordination pairs pass.

7. Fire & emergency

Fire load on a dedicated circuit with end-transfer: fed from the LV bus normally, taken over by the 200 kW diesel within 2 s on grid loss, meeting fire codes.

Pain Points → Solution → Evidence

Pain

Commercial load swings drop the power factor and trigger utility penalties

Solution

100 kvar automatic PFC on the 380 V side raises PF to 0.95

Evidence

pfcConfig: 100 kvar · 4×25 kvar · target pf 0.95

Pain

A fire/emergency outage is a safety incident

Solution

Dedicated fire circuit + end-transfer, 200 kW diesel backup

Evidence

V9: 200 kW backup ≥ grade-1 80 + fire 80 = 160 kW (100%)

Pain

High transformer losses inflate the power bill

Solution

Upgrade to SH15 amorphous-alloy to cut no-load losses

Evidence

TCO: S13→SH15 saves 2,015 kWh/yr (≈$241), 8.7 yr payback

Pain

Single transformer means one failure blacks out the building

Solution

Normal retail loads accept short outage; fire/emergency is diesel-backed

Evidence

N-1 single verdict fail, but fire/emergency backupCoverPct 100%

4 · Key Parameter Deep-Read

ParameterValueBasisImpact & Boundary
Transformer capacity400 kVA ×1Sd=320/0.95≈337 kVA → 400 kVA tier84% loading, cost-first
Rise to 500 kVA or dual if demand >360 kW
PFC100 kvar (4×25)avgPf 0.85 → pfTarget 0.95 gapPF compliant, no PF penalty
Auto step-switching for volatile commercial load
Load grading80 / 120 / 200 kWgrade-1 fire/emergency, grade-2 lifts, grade-3 retailBackup covers only grade-1+fire, controlling cost
Add diesel if grade-1 load grows
Fire backup200 kW dieselgrade-1 80 + fire 80 = 160 kW needV9 100% coverage, end-transfer ATS
Size fire pumps per fire codes
N-1 redundancyNone (single)Normal retail load accepts short outageFire/emergency is diesel-backed on transformer loss
Use N+1 dual if continuity is critical
Short-circuitMV 28.9 / LV 14.2 kA500 MVA fault level + uk=4%HV 31.5 / LV 25 kA breaking
Confirm actual fault level with grid

5 · Drawing Deep-Read

Dwg 3/26Single-line diagram — 10 kV feed → KYN28A-12 → S13-M-400/10 → 380 V GGD bus → retail / fire feeders
Why: The SLD shows load grading in place: normal retail on the main bus, fire/emergency on a dedicated circuit with end-transfer, and the diesel feeding the fire bus via ATS — the structural answer to “a fire outage is a safety incident”.
Dwg 19/26Reactive & harmonic compensation — 100 kvar (4×25 kvar detuned banks) · target PF 0.95
Why: The PFC raises PF 0.85→0.95, directly offsetting the PF penalties caused by volatile commercial load — the most direct cost saver in commercial distribution.
Dwg 8/26Short-circuit calculation — 500 MVA fault level · uk=4% · ikMv 28.9 kA · ikLv 14.2 kA · 240 mm² cable
Why: Short-circuit current sets breaker breaking capacity and minimum cable thermal cross-section (35 mm² vs 240 mm² selected) — the quantified safety basis.
Dwg 14/26Protection configuration — 50/51 overcurrent · incomer 0.6 s → transformer 0.3 s → feeder 0.1 s, 5 pairs pass
Why: The protection drawing places each stage and setting so a shop-circuit fault only trips its feeder, while fire circuits remain protected by auto-transfer.
Dwg 15/26TCC protection coordination curve — Incomer 50/51 (0.6 s) → LV incomer (0.3 s) → feeder (0.1 s), 0.3/0.2 s grading
Why: The TCC proves selectivity: a downstream fault only trips its feeder while upstream breakers hold; all 5 pairs meet the ≥0.2 s criterion.

The following drawings are shown for reference (full set in the configurator “View design document”):

Dwg 1 · Electrical design basisDwg 2 · Symbol legendDwg 3 · Single-line diagramDwg 4 · System topology diagramDwg 5 · Distribution systemDwg 6 · MV distribution systemDwg 7 · LV distribution systemDwg 8 · Short-circuit calculationDwg 9 · Applicable codes & standardsDwg 10 · Main equipment technical dataDwg 11 · Construction & testing requirementsDwg 12 · Power quality assessmentDwg 13 · SCADA architectureDwg 14 · Protection configurationDwg 15 · TCC protection coordination curveDwg 16 · Grounding systemDwg 17 · Lightning & surge protection (LPS/SPD)Dwg 18 · Equipment layout planDwg 19 · Reactive & harmonic compensationDwg 20 · Microgrid grid-tied / islanding transferDwg 21 · Secondary control & signal circuitDwg 22 · Terminal strip (protection & control panels)Dwg 23 · Panel front layout & panel scheduleDwg 24 · DC auxiliary power systemDwg 25 · Fuel oil systemDwg 26 · Earthing system (TN-S)

6 · Operation Demo (Deep-Read)

Energy flow

Grid 320 kW demand → MV switchgear → S13 transformer → 380 V LV bus → shop/lighting/lift/fire feeders. Commercial load swings diurnally; the 100 kvar PFC steps automatically to hold PF ≥0.95.

Fire & emergency

On grid loss the 200 kW diesel takes over fire pumps/emergency lighting within 2 s (end-transfer), showing the fire circuit never loses power through the transfer.

PF & reactive

Show the 100 kvar stepping: banks switch out at low load (avoid over-compensation) and in at peak, holding PF at 0.95 and offsetting penalties.

Losses & electricity cost

Oil-type losses p0=0.33 / pk=4.3 kW, ≈78,878 kWh/yr (≈$9,465); SH15 amorphous saves 2,015 kWh/yr (≈$241), 8.7 yr payback.

Other views (shown): 24h operation · Voltage profile · Scheme features · Environmental derating

7 · Economics & Payback

Configurator equipment total ≈ $99,100 (feasibility-level, incl. S13-M-400/10 transformer, MV/LV switchgear, 100 kvar PFC, 200 kW diesel and cables). Economics centre on PFC and losses: 100 kvar raises PF to 0.95, offsetting penalties; ≈78,878 kWh/yr losses ($9,465), with SH15 amorphous saving $241/yr at 8.7 yr payback.

$99,100
Equipment total
100 kvar
PFC
78,878 kWh
Annual losses
$9,465/yr
Loss cost
$241/yr
SH15 saving

8 · FAQ

What transformer size for a 400 kW commercial complex?
At kd=0.8 the demand is 320 kW ≈ 337 kVA → 400 kVA tier, single S13 oil unit, 84% loading.
Why is PFC important for commercial?
Commercial load swings and PF often falls below 0.9, incurring utility penalties; 100 kvar PFC raises PF to 0.95, avoiding penalties and reducing transformer loading.
How is fire/emergency load secured?
Dedicated fire circuit with end-transfer; a 200 kW diesel backs 100% of grade-1 80 + fire 80 kW, taking over within 2 s of grid loss.
What is load grading?
Loads are tiered by outage consequence: grade-1 (fire/emergency/critical) needs dual/backup supply, grade-2 (lifts) accepts short outage, grade-3 (retail) is normal supply.
What happens on a single transformer failure?
Normal retail loads lose power (acceptable), while fire/emergency stays up on diesel; upgrade to N+1 dual for whole-building continuity.
What does the commercial package cost?
Configurator total ≈ $99,100 (feasibility-level), covering transformer, MV/LV switchgear, PFC and diesel; contact our engineers for a formal quote.
Is the SH15 amorphous upgrade worth it?
Here it saves ≈$241/yr with 8.7 yr payback — modest at 84% load; higher load factor or tariff shortens the payback markedly.
How is the 380 V PFC sized?
The avgPf 0.85 → pfTarget 0.95 gap gives 100 kvar, split into 4 steps (4×25 kvar) for auto switching to follow commercial load swings.

Special Considerations

  • System fault level defaults to 500 MVA — confirm with the grid company (toConfirm: ssc).
  • Single transformer has no N-1 redundancy — only fire/emergency is diesel-backed on transformer loss; use N+1 dual for critical continuity.
  • Fire pump sizing must follow local fire codes; the configurator assumes 80 kW fire load.
  • Feasibility-level estimate; drawings pending a licensed design institute, not construction documents.

Turn this into your project

Open this exact scenario pre-loaded in the Power System Configurator, then generate the full design document or the operation & techno-economic assessment.

Open in Power System Configurator →

One-Stop Supply of Conventional & Solar Power Equipment

From power distribution system design to solar energy — transformers, switchgear, substations and solar equipment, sized and quoted in one place. Use our calculators to get a complete bill of materials and FOB price.