QDTB® Transformer
All figures are configurator-generated feasibility-level estimates; drawings are schematic deliverables pending refinement by a licensed design institute, not construction documents.
All Solutions

4 MW Green-Hydrogen Power: N+1 35 kV Feed + 4055 A APF + SVG Deep-Read

2×SCB13-4000/35 N+1 · APF 4055 A + SVG ±1 Mvar + PFC 1000 kvar · 35 kV · THDi 88% treated

1 · TL;DR Conclusion

Conclusion: this 4 MW green-hydrogen plant uses 35 kV dual feeds + 2×SCB13-4000/35 dry transformers (N+1) + a 4055 A active power filter (APF) + ±1 Mvar SVG + 1000 kvar PFC. Rectifier THDi of 88% is treated to pass; configurator total ≈ $1,524,603 (APF priced on application), LV fault 69.56 kA → 80 kA breaking (feasibility-level).

  • •2×4000 kVA dry transformers N+1; 84% loading after one-unit loss (pass), 2 s transfer ≤ 15 s allowed
  • •Electrolyzer rectifier load 3500 kW (88% nonlinear), THDi 88% → 4055 A APF + ±1 Mvar SVG + 1000 kvar PFC
  • •500 kW VFD compressor/pump start, ±1 Mvar SVG suppresses voltage flicker
  • •LV fault 69.56 kA → 4000 A MNS bus, 80 kA breaking; MV 35 kV at 25 kA
  • •≈2,917,501 kWh/yr losses ($489,427/yr)

2 · Solution Overview

A green-hydrogen plant's core load is the electrolyzer rectifier: purely nonlinear, large, and continuous, so harmonics are the top problem, while VFD auxiliaries add impact and reactive swings. This scheme pairs 35 kV infeed + N+1 transformers + active filtering + dynamic VAR to build a high-power, low-harmonic, high-continuity supply.

2×4000 kVA (SCB13, N+1)
Transformer
35 kV dual
Feed
3500 kW (88% nonlinear)
Rectifier load
500 kW (VFD)
VFD auxiliaries
APF 4055 A + SVG ±1 Mvar
Harmonic mitigation
80 kA (69.56 kA)
LV breaking
3200 kW
Demand
$1,524,603
Total
SourceRoleShare kWShare
Grid 35 kVbase3200 kW100%

3 · Design Process & Rationale

1. Requirement identification

A 4 MW hydrogen plant = 3500 kW electrolyzer rectifier (pure nonlinear) + 500 kW VFD auxiliaries (H2 compressor, cooling pumps). Continuous, harmonic-sensitive — a classic high-power nonlinear-load case.

2. Load grading & classification

Whole site as grade-2 (loadGrade2=4000); nonlinear 88% (3500/4000), impact 500 kW (VFD start). Demand 3200 kW (Kd=0.8).

3. Voltage level choice

4 MW continuous load exceeds economical 10 kV delivery → 35 kV infeed (KYN61-40.5 MV switchgear) to cut line current and losses.

4. Transformer sizing

3200 kW ÷ 0.8 PF = 4000 kVA; N+1 → 2×SCB13-4000/35 dry-type (indoor, fire-safe, low-noise), 84% loading after one-unit loss.

5. Harmonic & reactive mitigation

Rectifier THDi ≈ 88% far over the limit → 4055 A APF active filter to remove THDi; VFD impact + VAR swings → ±1 Mvar SVG; base reactive → 1000 kvar capacitors with detuned reactors.

6. Protection & breaking

LV fault current 69.56 kA (large 4000 kVA dry transformer) → 80 kA LV switchgear; MV 8.2 kA → 25 kA. Multi-level overcurrent grading 0.3/0.2 s, selectivity 13.6× satisfied.

7. Secondary & monitoring

61850 comms + DC auxiliary + SCADA for rectifier-transformer temperature, APF/SVG status and real-time power-quality monitoring to keep hydrogen production continuous.

Pain Points → Solution → Evidence

Pain

Electrolyzer rectifier harmonics trip the grid and derate transformers

Solution

4055 A APF active filter + detuned reactors + 12-pulse rectifier guidance

Evidence

V6: THDi 88% treated to pass by APF

Pain

VFD auxiliaries cause starting impact and VAR swings → voltage flicker

Solution

±1 Mvar SVG dynamic VAR (<10 ms response)

Evidence

500 kW VFD impact → SVG fast response; $70,000 in the BOM

Pain

A single fault at 4 MW blacks out the whole plant

Solution

35 kV dual feeds + N+1 dual transformers + auto-transfer

Evidence

N-1 pass (84% after one-unit loss), 2 s transfer ≤ 15 s

Pain

Continuous operation means high loss energy cost

Solution

SH15 amorphous upgrade + HV-side metering management

Evidence

$489,427/yr losses

4 · Key Parameter Deep-Read

ParameterValueBasisImpact & Boundary
Transformer capacity4000 kVA ×2 (SCB13, 35 kV)3200 kW ÷ 0.8 PF = 4000 kVA; N+1 → 2 dry units84% loading; dry-type is fire-safe and low-noise indoors
Above ~3800 kVA demand, step to 5000/6300
Incoming voltage35 kV4 MW continuous load exceeds economical 10 kV deliveryMV current only 66 A, big cut in line loss and drop
Needs a 35 kV supply point, else step down on site
Harmonic mitigationAPF 4055 A + detuned reactorsRectifier THDi 88%, 6-pulse characteristic orders 5/7/11/13THDi passes, protects transformer and metering
APF 4055 A priced on application; recommend 12-pulse rectifier
Dynamic VARSVG ±1 Mvar500 kW VFD impact + VAR swings<10 ms response suppresses voltage flicker
Staged with 1000 kvar capacitors (SVG fast + caps steady-state)
LV breaking80 kA (Icu)Fault current LV 69.56 kAMNS bus 4000 A, 1.1× breaking margin
Confirm actual system fault level with grid
MV breaking25 kA (Icu)Fault current HV 8.2 kAKYN61-40.5 vacuum switchgear, 3× margin
35 kV side needs dedicated protection settings
Annual losses2,917,501 kWh ($489,427)84% loading + line loss (88% nonlinear amplifies)Dominates opex and drives amorphous upgrade
Real loss under harmonics exceeds fundamental estimate — measure on site

5 · Drawing Deep-Read

Dwg 3/23Single-line diagram — 35 kV dual → 2×SCB13-4000/35 → MNS 4000 A LV bus → rectifier/electrolyzer + VFD auxiliary feeders
Why: The SLD ties the supply skeleton together: 35 kV dual feeds + N+1 dual transformers + 4000 A LV bus, with rectifier and VFD auxiliaries on separate feeders — the structural source of high-power continuous supply.
Dwg 12/23Power quality assessment — Rectifier THDi 88% · 6-pulse orders 5/7/11/13 · treated by APF
Why: Harmonics are a hard grid-compliance metric here: the 6-pulse rectifier's 5/7/11/13 characteristic orders drive THDi ≈ 88% far over the limit — the quantified basis for the 4055 A APF and a metering risk point.
Dwg 19/23Reactive & harmonic compensation — APF 4055 A + SVG ±1 Mvar + 1000 kvar capacitors
Why: Three stages with distinct roles: 1000 kvar caps for base VAR, ±1 Mvar SVG for VFD impact/flicker, 4055 A APF to remove rectifier harmonics — staged cooperation is the locus of power quality.
Dwg 8/23Short-circuit calculation — LV 69.56 kA / MV 8.2 kA · breaking LV 80 kA / HV 25 kA
Why: The 4000 kVA dry transformer + large bus push LV fault current to 69.56 kA, directly forcing 80 kA breaking — fault current quantifies the equipment breaking-capacity safety red line.
Dwg 14/23Protection configuration — 50/51 overcurrent + 61850 comms · 0.3/0.2 s grading · 13.6× selectivity
Why: A hydrogen plant fears a single fault blacking out the site: multi-level grading + 61850 high-speed comms ensure a downstream rectifier fault trips only its feeder while upstream 0.3 s holds, with 13.6× ensuring grading.

The following drawings are shown for reference (full set in the configurator “View design document”):

Dwg 1 · Electrical design basisDwg 2 · Symbol legendDwg 4 · System topology diagramDwg 5 · Distribution systemDwg 6 · MV distribution systemDwg 7 · LV distribution systemDwg 9 · Applicable codes & standardsDwg 10 · Main equipment technical dataDwg 11 · Construction & testing requirementsDwg 13 · SCADA architectureDwg 15 · TCC protection coordination curveDwg 16 · Grounding systemDwg 17 · Lightning & surge protection (LPS/SPD)Dwg 18 · Equipment layout planDwg 20 · Secondary control & signal circuitDwg 21 · Terminal strip (protection & control panels)Dwg 22 · Panel front layout & panel scheduleDwg 23 · DC auxiliary power system

6 · Operation Demo (Deep-Read)

Energy flow

35 kV infeed → dual transformers (84% loading) → 4000 A LV bus → rectifier/electrolyzer 3200 kW + VFD auxiliaries; system loss 333.05 kW (10.41%), of which line 317.52 kW and transformer 15.53 kW — the high loss under harmonics is clear.

Power quality & harmonics

6-pulse orders 5/7/11/13 dominate, THDi 88%; the 4055 A APF removes THDi, ±1 Mvar SVG suppresses flicker and 1000 kvar caps cover base VAR — three stages bring THDi to pass.

Fault & protection

Rehearses 80 kA breaking under a 69.56 kA LV fault plus multi-level grading (downstream 0.1 s, upstream 0.3 s), with 61850 and DC auxiliary — a single fault never escalates.

Loss & cost

2,917,501 kWh/yr ($489,427).

Other views (shown): LCC (life-cycle cost) · Voltage profile · Scheme features · Environmental derating

7 · Economics & Payback

Equipment total ≈ $1,524,603 (the 4055 A APF is priced on application); no PV/BESS so no generation payback model. Economics center on operation: 2,917,501 kWh/yr losses ($489,427/yr). The $70,000 SVG and $27,000 PFC are one-off investments buying grid harmonic compliance and continuous-run reliability.

$1,524,603
Equipment total
$489,427
Annual loss cost
69.56 kA
LV fault level
5.86 cal/cm² (Cat 2)
Arc-flash energy

8 · FAQ

What transformer size for a 4 MW hydrogen plant?
3200 kW ÷ 0.8 = 4000 kVA → 4000 kVA tier; N+1 uses 2×SCB13-4000/35 dry transformers, 84% loading after one-unit loss.
Why 35 kV instead of 10 kV infeed?
4 MW continuous load exceeds economical 10 kV delivery; at 35 kV the MV current is only 66 A, sharply cutting line loss and drop — needs a 35 kV supply point.
How are rectifier harmonics handled?
The electrolyzer's 6-pulse rectifier gives THDi ≈ 88% far over the limit; a 4055 A APF active filter removes it. A 12-pulse rectifier is recommended to cut the 5th/7th at source.
What's the difference between SVG and capacitors?
1000 kvar caps cover steady-state base VAR; the ±1 Mvar SVG responds in <10 ms to suppress VFD impact and flicker — the two are staged together.
What happens on a power outage?
35 kV dual feeds + N+1 transformers + auto-transfer: 84% loading after one-unit loss, 2 s transfer keeps hydrogen production continuous.
How much does the scheme cost?
≈ $1,524,603 (4055 A APF priced on application), including 2×4000 kVA dry transformers, MV/LV switchgear, SVG, PFC and secondary systems.
Are operating losses high?
2,917,501 kWh/yr ($489,427).
What is the LV fault level and breaking?
LV 69.56 kA → 80 kA breaking; MV 8.2 kA → 25 kA.
Are the rectifier and isolation transformers in the quote?
No — they belong to the electrolyzer package / specialist design. The configurator models AC distribution + harmonic mitigation only; those transformers are coordinated with the electrolyzer OEM.

Special Considerations

  • The rectifier transformer and isolation transformer (for the electrolyzer DC bus) sit in the electrolyzer-package / specialist design scope — the configurator models the 35 kV→0.4 kV AC distribution plus harmonic mitigation, and does NOT price the rectifier/isolation transformers themselves.
  • The 4055 A APF is an extra-large rating priced on application (excluded from total); prefer a 12-pulse rectifier to suppress the 5th/7th at source and sharply cut APF size.
  • Transformer loss under harmonics exceeds the fundamental estimate — for continuous duty use a K-factor transformer or extra margin, and verify THDi by measurement.
  • LV 69.56 kA fault needs 80 kA breaking; arc-flash 5.86 cal/cm² (Cat 2) — a formal IEEE 1584 study is required before PPE selection.
  • Feasibility-level estimate; drawings pending a licensed design institute. Rectifier/isolation/DC-bus selection must be coordinated with the electrolyzer OEM.

Turn this into your project

Open this exact scenario pre-loaded in the Power System Configurator, then generate the full design document or the operation & techno-economic assessment.

Open in Power System Configurator →

One-Stop Supply of Conventional & Solar Power Equipment

From power distribution system design to solar energy — transformers, switchgear, substations and solar equipment, sized and quoted in one place. Use our calculators to get a complete bill of materials and FOB price.