QDTB® Transformer
All figures are configurator-generated feasibility-level estimates; drawings are schematic deliverables pending refinement by a licensed design institute, not construction documents.
All Solutions

500 kW PV+Storage+Charging Station: Energy Mix & Economics Deep-Read

Tri-integrated · 4×DC120kW+4×AC22kW chargers · 200 kWp PV · 150 kW/300 kWh BESS · grid-tied

1 · TL;DR Conclusion

Conclusion: this 500 kW tri-integrated station uses 4×DC120kW + 4×AC22kW chargers (0.5 diversity → 284 kW demand) + 200 kWp PV + 150 kW/300 kWh BESS + a 10 kV grid feed, with an S13-M-315/10 transformer — configurator total ≈ $182,158, EPC ≈ $192,500, 5 yr payback, 24.57% IRR (feasibility-level).

  • •Energy mix: 200 kWp PV (70% share) + 150 kW BESS (30%) + grid backup, 634 kW installed
  • •Charger diversity 0.5: 568 kW nameplate → 284 kW demand; 315 kVA transformer at 95% loading (tight)
  • •BESS 150 kW/300 kWh shaves 4 h, saving ≈$28,470/yr (BESS vs pure-diesel basis)
  • •Economics: $192,500 EPC, 5 yr payback, 24.57% IRR, 492% 25-yr ROI, LCOE $0.0983/kWh
  • •≈121.8 t CO2 avoided/yr, 0.8 self-consumption ratio

2 · Solution Overview

A PV+storage+charging station integrates PV generation, battery storage and EV chargers into one smart microgrid: PV serves chargers first, surplus charges the battery, which discharges at peak tariffs. This 500 kW station is charger-dominated, with PV+BESS for economic optimization.

1×315 kVA (S13-M-315/10)
Transformer
4×DC120 + 4×AC22 kW
Chargers
568 kW (0.5 diversity)
Nameplate
284 kW
Charge demand
200 kWp
PV
150 kW / 300 kWh
BESS
10 kV grid
Feed
Grid-tied
Mode
SourceRoleShare kWShare
Grid 10 kVbase0 kW0%
Solar PV 200 kWpvariable200 kW70%
BESS 150 kW / 300 kWhvariable84 kW30%

PV + Storage + Charging Configurator

Configure a combined solar, storage and EV charging system with a complete equipment list and reference pricing.

Open the Calculator

3 · Design Process & Rationale

1. Requirement identification

Charging stations are charger-dominated; DC fast charging (120 kW) has high per-gun power and noticeable rectifier harmonics. First fix the charger mix and diversity — the core difference from a normal load station.

2. Charge demand & diversity

4×DC120 + 4×AC22 = 568 kW nameplate, but chargers don't all peak at once; at 0.5 diversity the demand is 284 kW — the basis for sizing the transformer at 284 kW, not 568 kW.

3. Source mix

200 kWp PV + 150 kW/300 kWh BESS + 10 kV grid backup. Storage duration 2 h (300/150) for peak-arbitrage and shaving; grid guarantees charging continuity when PV/BESS are low.

4. Transformer sizing

284 kW demand ≈ 299 kVA apparent → 315 kVA tier. Single unit (redundancy=single) — a charging station tolerates brief outages (grid+BESS cover), so N+1 is unnecessary.

5. Distribution & protection

MV incomer → 315 kVA transformer → GGD LV switchgear → charger feeders + PV/BESS interconnection branches. Rectifier harmonics need detuned reactors + APF if required.

6. Grid connection & economics

Grid-tied; PV self-consumption ratio 0.8 with surplus exported at $0.06/kWh. BESS shaves 150 kW×4 h at a $0.13/kWh spread, saving ≈$28,470/yr.

7. Special requirements

Grid-connection approval is required (gridCodeNote TBC); charger harmonics and diversity are the two station-specific factors, both explicitly modeled here.

Pain Points → Solution → Evidence

Pain

More chargers push demand charges to the cap and peak-tariff bills explode

Solution

BESS time-of-use arbitrage + peak shaving: discharge at peak, charge at valley

Evidence

V24 shaving: 150 kW×4 h saves ≈$28,470/yr ($0.13/kWh spread)

Pain

Unsure how much PV and storage to size

Solution

Configurator derives the mix from load & irradiation: 200 kWp PV (70%) + 150 kW BESS (30%)

Evidence

capacitySummary: 634 kW installed, 100% renewable share, 2 h storage duration

Pain

Grid approval hard / fear of anti-backfeed penalties

Solution

Grid-tied with self-consumption-first (0.8) and surplus export at $0.06/kWh

Evidence

toConfirm gridCodeNote: grid approval / anti-islanding / PF per local grid code

Pain

When does it pay back?

Solution

≈$192,500 EPC; PV self-use + BESS arbitrage save ≈$50,398/yr

Evidence

economic: 5 yr payback, 24.57% IRR, 492% 25-yr ROI

4 · Key Parameter Deep-Read

ParameterValueBasisImpact & Boundary
Transformer capacity315 kVA ×1284 kW / 0.95 ≈ 299 kVA → 315 kVA tier95% loading (high); higher losses and bills
Charger expansion or higher diversity needs 400/500 kVA
Charger mix4×DC120 + 4×AC22 kWFast-charge-dominant + slow-charge top-up, a typical layout568 kW nameplate, notable rectifier harmonics
Gun power & count vary with vehicle types and bays
Diversity factor0.5Chargers don't all peak simultaneously (industry value)284 kW demand (568×0.5) drives the transformer tier
Holiday peaks can exceed 0.5 — calibrate with real monitoring
PV capacity200 kWpSelf-consumption-first; ≈203,040 kWh/yr generation70% output share, feeds chargers in daytime
Limited by roof/site area; larger PV needs larger BESS to absorb
BESS capacity150 kW / 300 kWh (2 h)Time-of-use arbitrage + shaving, 2 h durationShaves 150 kW×4 h, saving $28,470/yr
Longer duration = more arbitrage but higher investment
Grid modegrid-tiedCharging stations are normally grid-tied, not off-gridAnti-backfeed & grid approval are compliance prerequisites
For islanding use grid-tie-island (requires black-start)
EconomicsIRR 24.57% · 5 yr$192,500 EPC + $50,398/yr saving + 25-yr cashflowThe core investability metric
Tariff, irradiation and diversity are the three sensitive variables

5 · Drawing Deep-Read

Dwg 3/29Single-line diagram — 10 kV grid + 200 kWp PV + 150 kW/300 kWh BESS → 315 kVA transformer → LV bus → charger feeders
Why: The SLD's job here is showing how multiple sources connect: PV via grid-tie inverter, BESS via bidirectional PCS into the LV bus, grid via transformer as backup — three source paths converge with charger load on one bus, the physical locus of the mix design.
Dwg 4/29System topology — Grid (backup) · PV (70%) · BESS (30%) → transformer → distribution → chargers
Why: The topology lays out the energy hierarchy: three sources → MV bus → transformer → LV bus → chargers, making the dispatch logic visible — PV serves chargers first, surplus charges the battery, grid backs up.
Dwg 20/29Microgrid transfer — PCC · anti-islanding 81U/81O+32R · 4 transfer logics
Why: Though grid-tied, this drawing rehearses islanding transfer and anti-islanding (IEC 62898 / IEEE 1547), pre-wiring a compliance path for future off-grid capability — the technical answer to the “grid approval” pain point.
Dwg 19/29Reactive & harmonic compensation — Detuned reactor bank · rectifier harmonic mitigation
Why: DC fast chargers rectify and generate harmonics; the PFC bank uses detuned reactors to prevent amplification, adding APF when THDi ~20% exceeds the limit — a must for charging-station power quality.
Dwg 8/29Short-circuit calculation — LV fault level · 25 kA breaking capacity check
Why: The station has PV inverters and BESS PCS, but the fault level is dominated by the grid system (500 MVA assumed). This verifies breaker breaking capacity and cable thermal stability so the DC fast-charging high-current circuits trip reliably.
Dwg 14/29Protection configuration — 50/51 overcurrent + 0.3/0.2 s grading
Why: This places protection settings for the grid incomer, transformer, charger feeders and PV/BESS branches. Charger circuits are high-current and harmonic-rich, so protection must balance overcurrent with not tripping on harmonics.
Dwg 25/29Peak-shaving single-line — 150 kW/300 kWh BESS via PCS to LV bus · arbitrage/shaving
Why: This lands the BESS from 'a source' to 'a dispatch branch': BESS ties into the LV bus via a bidirectional PCS, discharging at peak and charging at valley. It's the structural fix for the “demand charges hit the cap” pain — shaving 150 kW×4 h saves ≈$28,470/yr.
Dwg 26/29Peak-shaving operation profile — 24h profile · valley charge / peak discharge shaving
Why: This turns time-of-use arbitrage into a 24h timeline: charge at valley, discharge at peak, showing the shaved demand peak and saved bill. It's the operational source of the economics conclusion (≈$28,470/yr shaving).

The following drawings are shown for reference (full set in the configurator “View design document”):

Dwg 1 · Electrical design basisDwg 15 · TCC coordination curveDwg 12 · Power quality assessmentDwg 27 · BMS communicationDwg 28 · Fire & thermal zoningDwg 29 · EMS state machineDwg 9 · Applicable standardsDwg 10 · Equipment technical dataDwg 13 · SCADA architectureDwg 16 · Grounding systemDwg 17 · Surge protectionDwg 18 · Equipment layoutDwg 21 · Secondary control & signalDwg 24 · DC auxiliary powerDwg 2 · Symbol legendDwg 11 · Construction & testingDwg 22 · Terminal stripDwg 23 · Panel layout

6 · Operation Demo (Deep-Read)

Energy flow

PV 200 kW → chargers first → surplus to BESS; BESS discharges 150 kW at peak and charges at valley; grid fills the gap. The chain shows three-source real-time dispatch balancing charger load.

Economics

203,040 kWh/yr generated, 162,432 kWh self-used (0.8) + 40,608 kWh exported; $50,398/yr saved, $192,500 invested, 5 yr payback, 24.57% IRR, LCOE $0.0983/kWh, with a 25-yr cashflow curve and payback point.

LCC (life-cycle cost)

At 6% discount, 25-yr cumulative cost across tiers: S13 → SH15 amorphous saves 1,752 kWh/yr (≈$210), 3.3 yr payback; the high-efficiency tier wins on long-run cost.

24h operation

A typical-day curve: daytime PV overlaps the charging peak, overnight valley charging + BESS discharge shaves the peak — showing time-of-use arbitrage and demand management in time order.

Other views (shown): Power quality & harmonics · Voltage profile · Scheme features · Environmental derating

7 · Economics & Payback

Equipment total ≈ $182,158, EPC ≈ $192,500 (incl. PV/BESS/chargers/distribution). PV self-use saves ≈$50,398/yr (incl. BESS shaving); overall 5 yr payback, 24.57% IRR, 492% 25-yr ROI, LCOE $0.0983/kWh, NPV $303,489, 121.8 t CO2 avoided/yr.

$192,500
EPC investment
5 yr
Payback
24.57%
IRR
492%
25-yr ROI
$0.0983/kWh
LCOE
121.8 t/yr
CO2 avoided
Key assumptions driving these numbers
$0.12/kWh
Electricity price
$0.06/kWh
Feed-in tariff
203040 kWh
Annual generation (P50)
80%
Self-consumption
$0.13/kWh
Peak-valley spread

8 · FAQ

How much PV should a PV+storage+charging station have?
This scheme uses 200 kWp (70% share) for ≈203,040 kWh/yr, self-consumption-first. Larger PV needs larger BESS to absorb, else curtailment or backfeed.
How big a BESS, and how is duration computed?
150 kW / 300 kWh = 2 h (300÷150). 2–4 h covers time-of-use arbitrage; off-grid backup needs ≥8 h plus a black-start source.
How is charger diversity set?
Default 0.5: 568 kW nameplate → 284 kW demand. Holiday peaks can exceed 0.5 — calibrate with real monitoring or the transformer will overload.
When does it pay back?
≈$192,500 EPC; PV self-use + BESS shaving save ≈$50,398/yr; ~5 yr payback, 24.57% IRR.
What grid-connection paperwork is needed?
Grid approval + anti-backfeed/PF/grid code (gridCodeNote). Self-consumption-first, surplus exported at $0.06/kWh.
How are charger harmonics handled?
DC fast-charge rectifiers are harmonic-heavy; detuned reactors prevent amplification, add APF when THDi 20% exceeds the limit.
Is 315 kVA transformer enough?
284 kW → 299 kVA, so 315 kVA at 95% loading is tight. On charger expansion, step directly to 400/500 kVA.
How much vs a grid-only charging station?
BESS vs pure-diesel (off-grid) saves ≈$28,470/yr; vs grid-only it's mainly PV self-use savings plus BESS time-of-use arbitrage.

Special Considerations

  • Grid-connection approval is required (anti-backfeed / PF / grid code); assumed grid-tied here, gridCodeNote TBC (toConfirm: gridCodeNote).
  • Charger diversity 0.5 is a default; holiday peaks can exceed it — calibrate with real operating data or the 95% transformer loading will overload.
  • 95% transformer loading is high; if chargers expand, step directly to 400/500 kVA.
  • 2 h storage covers time-of-use arbitrage; off-grid/black-start needs ≥8 h plus a black-start source.
  • Feasibility-level estimate; drawings pending a licensed design institute.

Turn this into your project

Open this exact scenario pre-loaded in the Power System Configurator, then generate the full design document or the operation & techno-economic assessment.

Open in Power System Configurator →

One-Stop Supply of Conventional & Solar Power Equipment

From power distribution system design to solar energy — transformers, switchgear, substations and solar equipment, sized and quoted in one place. Use our calculators to get a complete bill of materials and FOB price.