QDTB® Transformer
All figures are configurator-generated feasibility-level estimates; drawings are schematic deliverables pending refinement by a licensed design institute, not construction documents.
All Solutions

5 kW Home Solar: 220 V Single-Phase PV + 5 kW/10 kWh BESS Self-Consumption Deep-Read

5 kWp PV · 5 kW/10 kWh home BESS (2 h) · 220 V single-phase · anti-backfeed (zero export)

1 · TL;DR Conclusion

Conclusion: this 5 kW home runs a 220 V single-phase system with 5 kWp PV + a 5 kW/10 kWh home battery in self-consumption mode (zero export) — configurator total ≈ $17,678, EPC ≈ $5,500, 4 yr payback, 25.51% IRR, 514% 25-yr ROI, 3.01 t CO2 avoided/yr (feasibility-level).

  • •220 V single-phase LV feed; 5 kW installed → 4 kW demand, stdKva 4, 100% renewable share
  • •5 kWp PV ≈5,016 kWh/yr (P50), 0.8 self-consumption → 4,013 kWh self-used + 1,003 kWh surplus
  • •5 kW/10 kWh BESS (2 h, 768 VDC) + anti-backfeed device (zero export) — backup + peak-shaving
  • •Economics: $5,500 EPC, 4 yr payback, 25.51% IRR, 514% 25-yr ROI, LCOE $0.1137/kWh, NPV ≈ -$532 (marginal)
  • •Watch: V1 voltage drop 5–7% (single-phase), V8 storage 2 h < 4 h peak-shaving basis

2 · Solution Overview

A 5 kW home solar system is the smallest scale in the configurator: a 220 V single-phase connection, rooftop PV sized to the home load, and a home battery to shift daytime solar into the evening. Self-consumption with zero export (anti-backfeed) is the default under residential feed-in restrictions.

220 V single-phase (0.22 kV)
Feed
5 kWp
PV
5 kW / 10 kWh (2 h)
BESS
4 kW (5 kW installed)
Demand
100%
Renewable share
Self-consumption, zero export
Mode
768 VDC (240 cells)
Battery voltage
$5,500
EPC investment
SourceRoleShare kWShare
Grid 0.22 kVbase0 kW0%
Solar PV 5 kWpvariable4 kW100%
BESS 5 kW / 10 kWhvariable0 kW0%

3 · Design Process & Rationale

1. Requirement identification

5 kW home load (lighting 1.5 kW + appliances 3.5 kW), single-phase 220 V supply, largest motor 1.5 kW.

2. Load & grading

No critical/graded load; demand 4 kW (0.8 diversity).

3. PV sizing

5 kWp rooftop ≈ 5,016 kWh/yr (1,200 full-load hours, PR 0.836).

4. BESS sizing

5 kW/10 kWh (2 h) home battery, 768 VDC, for self-consumption shift + backup.

5. Zero export

antiExport=yes → anti-backfeed (reverse-power) protection auto-added.

6. Grid connection

220 V single-phase, anti-islanding + metering per local grid code (pending approval).

Pain Points → Solution → Evidence

Pain

Feed-in is restricted or not worth it

Solution

Self-consumption + zero-export anti-backfeed

Evidence

antiExport=yes; anti-backfeed device auto-added ($1,800)

Pain

Solar peaks at midday but the home loads in the evening

Solution

10 kWh BESS shifts 2 h of solar

Evidence

storageHours 2; V24 shave saves $949/yr (spread $0.13)

Pain

Single-phase voltage drop and small-cable limits

Solution

16 mm² cable + PF correction

Evidence

V1 warns 5–7% drop — enlarge cable or improve PF

Pain

Small systems look marginal on paper

Solution

Honest economics: value is resilience + self-consumption

Evidence

4 yr payback, 25.51% IRR, NPV ≈ -$532 — subsidies/TOU improve it

4 · Key Parameter Deep-Read

ParameterValueBasisImpact & Boundary
PV capacity5 kWp5,016 kWh/yr (P50), PR 0.836100% renewable, feeds 4 kW
Limited by roof area / shading
BESS capacity5 kW / 10 kWh (2 h)Self-consumption + backup768 VDC, 280 Ah cells
V8: 2 h < 4 h peak-shaving basis — enlarge for TOU arbitrage
Self-consumption0.8selfUseRatio default4,013 kWh self-used, 1,003 kWh surplus
Higher with a larger battery
Zero exportantiExport=yesFeed-in restrictionAnti-backfeed auto-added
Net metering allowed → set antiExport=no
Economics$5,500 EPCPV + BESS scope4 yr payback, 25.51% IRR
Marginal at 5 kW — subsidies/TOU improve
Voltage drop5–7% (V1 warn)220 V single-phase 5 kWTerminal 0.975 pu
Enlarge cable / improve PF / 3-phase
CO2 avoided3.01 t/yr5,016 kWh × grid carbon≈3 t avoided
Grid-mix dependent

5 · Drawing Deep-Read

Dwg 3/28Single-line diagram — 220 V single-phase → 5 kWp PV + 5 kW/10 kWh BESS → home loads (anti-backfeed)
Why: The SLD shows the self-consumption skeleton: grid, PV and BESS meet on the 220 V bus with an anti-backfeed device at the PCC — the structural source of 'in only, never out'.
Dwg 4/28System topology — Grid · PV · BESS → 220 V bus → lighting/appliances
Why: The topology visualizes the three-source hierarchy — PV (day), BESS (shift + backup), grid (backstop) — with EMS dispatch, the energy-management landing point for a home.
Dwg 19/28Microgrid transfer — PCC · anti-islanding + anti-backfeed · auto-disconnect on grid loss
Why: The microgrid drawing previews the anti-islanding action: grid-tie inverter + anti-backfeed relay disconnect on grid loss to prevent islanding — mandatory protection for residential grid connection.
Dwg 28/28EMS state machine — PV-BESS shaving/shifting · self-consumption dispatch · backup
Why: The EMS state machine is the dispatch brain of self-consumption: PV feeds the home first, surplus charges the battery, battery discharges in the evening — the source of V24's $949/yr shaving saving.
Dwg 18/28Reactive & harmonic compensation — Home reactive compensation · single-phase PF
Why: Single-phase home loads have low PF; reactive compensation lifts PF and eases V1's 5–7% voltage drop — the power-quality landing point for small systems.

The following drawings are shown for reference (full set in the configurator “View design document”):

Dwg 11 · Power quality assessmentDwg 7 · Short-circuit calculationDwg 15 · Grounding systemDwg 16 · Lightning & surge protectionDwg 17 · Equipment layout planDwg 24 · Storage peak-shaving single-lineDwg 25 · Shaving operation profile

6 · Operation Demo (Deep-Read)

Energy flow

Daytime 5 kW PV feeds the 4 kW home first, surplus charges the battery; evening battery discharge + grid fills the gap; anti-backfeed guarantees zero export — self-consumption at a glance.

Economics

5,016 kWh/yr; PV saves $1,491 (incl. BESS shaving); $5,500 EPC, 4 yr payback, 25.51% IRR, LCOE $0.1137/kWh, NPV ≈ -$532, 3.01 t CO2 avoided/yr.

Power quality

220 V single-phase drop 5–7% (V1 warn), terminal 0.975 pu; reactive compensation lifts PF — the key power-quality point for small systems.

Backup & resilience

The 10 kWh battery carries ~2 h of the 4 kW demand on grid loss; a hybrid inverter is needed for true off-grid islanding.

Other views (shown): Voltage profile · Scheme features · LCC (life-cycle cost) · Environmental

7 · Economics & Payback

EPC ≈ $5,500 (5 kWp PV + 5 kW/10 kWh BESS). PV self-consumption saves ≈$1,491/yr (at $0.12/kWh) (incl. BESS shaving); overall 4 yr payback, 25.51% IRR, 514% 25-yr ROI, LCOE $0.1137/kWh, NPV ≈ -$532 (near-breakeven), 3.01 t CO2 avoided/yr. Residential scale is marginal without subsidies — the primary value is backup resilience + self-consumption.

$5,500
EPC investment
4 yr
Payback
25.51%
IRR
514%
25-yr ROI
$0.1137/kWh
LCOE
3.01 t/yr
CO2 avoided
Key assumptions driving these numbers
$0.12/kWh
Electricity price
$0.06/kWh
Feed-in tariff
5016 kWh
Annual generation (P50)
80%
Self-consumption
$0.13/kWh
Peak-valley spread

8 · FAQ

How much solar for a 5 kW home?
5 kWp matches the load; it yields ≈5,016 kWh/yr (P50, 1,200 h, PR 0.836), 100% renewable share.
What battery size?
5 kW/10 kWh (2 h) home BESS at 768 VDC; V8 flags 2 h < 4 h for peak-shaving, so size up for TOU arbitrage.
Single-phase or three-phase?
220 V single-phase suits a ≤5 kW home; V1 shows 5–7% voltage drop — larger homes should go 380 V three-phase.
Can I sell excess to the grid?
In zero-export mode (antiExport=yes) no — an anti-backfeed device blocks it; with net metering set antiExport=no to sell the ≈1,003 kWh/yr surplus.
What does it cost and pay back?
≈$5,500 EPC, 4 yr payback, 25.51% IRR, 514% 25-yr ROI, LCOE $0.1137/kWh — marginal without subsidies.
Does it keep the lights on in a blackout?
The 10 kWh battery backs ~2 h of the 4 kW demand; it is grid-tied, so full off-grid needs a hybrid inverter with islanding.
What about anti-islanding?
The grid-tie inverter + anti-backfeed relay disconnect on grid loss per the local grid code — grid-connection approval required.
How much CO2 does it save?
≈3.01 t/yr (5,016 kWh at grid carbon intensity).
Why is the NPV slightly negative?
At 5 kW the fixed costs dominate; NPV ≈ -$532 over 25 yr at current prices — subsidies, higher self-consumption, or TOU tariffs flip it positive.

Special Considerations

  • V1 warns cumulative voltage drop 5–7% on 220 V single-phase — enlarge the service cable or improve PF before sign-off.
  • V8: 2 h storage < 4 h peak-shaving basis; for time-of-use arbitrage enlarge the battery.
  • Zero-export mode auto-adds an anti-backfeed device; if net metering is available, set antiExport=no to sell the ≈1,003 kWh/yr surplus.
  • NPV ≈ -$532 (near-breakeven) at $0.12/kWh + $0.06/kWh feed-in — subsidies or a higher TOU spread materially improve it.
  • Feasibility-level; grid-connection approval (anti-islanding + metering) pending per local grid code.

Turn this into your project

Open this exact scenario pre-loaded in the Power System Configurator, then generate the full design document or the operation & techno-economic assessment.

Open in Power System Configurator →

One-Stop Supply of Conventional & Solar Power Equipment

From power distribution system design to solar energy — transformers, switchgear, substations and solar equipment, sized and quoted in one place. Use our calculators to get a complete bill of materials and FOB price.